Score: 4

"Not bad for a dressup."

submission: TankMan DressUp

date: August 17, 2006

The graphics were pretty nice, although they were basically just tankman graphics so they weren't unique by any means. It was okay for a dressup, but very simplistic.

Also, have your A with a circle around it button's hit frame be a box, so you can click anywhere on it and move it around instead of just the red.

Score: 7

"Twas okay."

submission: TANKMEN 1.5

date: August 17, 2006

I didn't really like the first Tankmen episode, and I have to say that this one wasn't a huge improvement. The jokes were too childish and immature for me to really find them funny, and as that seemed to be the central pillar of this animation, it sort of fell through.

Additionally the ending seemed to abrupt for me.

I hope that your next episode has sharper humor, but oh well. You certaintly get a lot of people to laugh and I'm just one out of hundreds. :P

On the other hand, the graphics and style of the animation were great. Practically flawless.

Score: 6

"A cool idea, too bad no one has webcams"

submission: WebCam Face Painter

date: August 14, 2006

Yeah. The idea is pretty cool. It could do with some different brush styles and size modification (past 3 sizes, a slider would be nice) and opacity modifying so that even if the user didn't have a webcam they could still use the paint aspect to draw with it.

Also, background music never hurts.

Score: 8

"Not particularly funny or exciting, but strangely-"

submission: 3-2-1 Relaunch!

date: August 13, 2006

satisfying.

I liked watching the animation. It wasn't that funny because it's hard to make characters that look like that actually be funny I would imagine. The graphics were very nice though, and everything flowed well. Good job here, and this seems like a possibility for daily feature.

Score: 6

"Hmm..."

submission: RPG movement tutorial

date: August 13, 2006

Well, the graphics section was a little too specific. Not EVERYONE wants to create a top down moving guy that moves exactly like how you had him move.

The ActionScript section was alright. You explained what each line did, but you didn't explain how it all worked as a whole, which is a problem.

Score: 5

"Dang. That wasn't funny."

submission: Tommy and Loki 3

date: August 13, 2006

The whole gasolene burning thing has been so overdone. Next time try for something new and unique, and maybe more abrupt. The graphics were pretty good though.

Score: 5

"Meh."

submission: Cursor Game

date: August 13, 2006

Nice cursor, but the electricity shouldn't be in perfect squares because that just looks ugly.

This is way too repetitive. Clicking on zepplins over and over again just doesn't do it for me. The music does not go along with it at all. At least the cursors have nice graphics, but they end up being distracting.

Score: 4

"Huh?"

submission: Catchy Tune

date: August 13, 2006

I don't understand the joke, if there was one. The graphics were nice though, but for some reason my sound was totally out of sync with the animation.

Score: 3

"Hummm"

submission: Cloud's Arena Game

date: August 13, 2006

I wish there was actual user interaction, but there was none. Worse is that only the Easy battles work. The sound was rather dull, and all this game consisted of was watching your guy beat up 1 monster over and over again. One time, I saw his HP in the negatives. Thats a bug you might want to fix, or maybe you should just scrap this (no offense, but it's hard to make something like this fun at all) and make something with more interaction. Additionally, make the sound less repetitive. Add some background music perhaps.

Score: 2

"That was utterly useless."

submission: Blowup A Terrorist

date: August 13, 2006

The graphics were alright, but for that small of a thing, you couldn't even spell "bolw" right. Along with that, the interactivity for this "game" was terrible. At least make it a little fun to play, because all I had to do was click.