Score: 4

"Needs more work."

submission: EazyP-Light In The Dark

date: June 26, 2004

Whether intentional or not, the fact remains that it was uploaded at the right time and voted on the same time to bring it to #1 of the week. Apparently you also did this with Virtual Cocaine. tsk tsk, 2 times I dont consider an accident. As for the song, it needs more accompainiment, better note placement, and more importantly, more work. Dont flame me in the author comment box, I'm telling the truth. Work on your songs for more than ~30 minutes and then submit. Do it until it sounds good to yourself as well as perhaps a peer or two, and then submit. Work harder, keep trying, dont cheat the system.

Score: 9

"Im not sure why it has 4k downloads..."

submission: God Of Stryph© by Bladen

date: June 26, 2004

But good job. I mean, it isnt the greatest song I have ever heard, but it does have a nice beat, nice synths and just sorta dancish. So even though its not on my top 5 list (even though I dont have one) good job making 4k people happy with it, thats a huge accomplishment because even people like RageIV and ParagonX9 top at about 2k d/ls. I dont know what it is, but GJ.

Keep making songs, listening to this Seramite song which I like a good amount more.

Score: 10

"Great. Just... great."

submission: Jump into summer

date: June 20, 2004

You are probably the best unknown audio creater on NG. Your newer songs are really good. I could (and do) listen to this for hours on end without getting bored. The nice blend of piano, synth (I think) shakers, drums... everything just fits together. Look at that, 17 downloads and 5 (now 6) reviews. Most audios I've seen have around 300 d/ls when they have 5 reviews.

I also agree with the last guy, The audio portal needs some major work, its like the guy working on it decided to quit halfway through. People need to review and vote more, and there needs to be like... ah, the whole thing needs to be more like the flash portal.

Wow, thats long. I really said a lot there. I eagerly await your next piece :-)

Score: 5

"More... need more."

submission: Simple Beat

date: June 20, 2004

It looks like you voted 5 on each of your audios, which is bad. You really shouldnt do that. The beats nice, but its only repeated 4 times and then thats all. Add some meleody and some accompianiment, and then you'll have a nice tune.

Score: 9

"Great songs!"

submission: Sober Suzie

date: June 6, 2004

I was just browsing your folder and I must admit that your songs are good. They have the nice techno feel to them and are nice just to listen to. Noticed that you responded to all your reviews, so I'm asking what program do you use?

Anyway, excellent job.

Score: 10

"Now that I've payed more attention"

submission: Relax and Chill

date: June 5, 2004

I just listened to your three songs and I must admit I'm impressed. I haven't heard songs this good and this well put together in a long time. Good job on all of them. Your work and effort is shown in each. Very nice!

Score: 9

"Very nice job on this."

submission: Alien Takeover (2:20)

date: June 5, 2004

You did a really good job on this. Normally the different instruments wouldnt fit together well and the song would turn out like trash. This song however, works well and its nice to listen to.

Score: 9

"Good... Very good."

submission: Computer Talk

date: June 5, 2004

Although very repetitive, it has a nice feel to it. I gotta ask, what program do you use to make this? Just curious.

Score: 6

"Mmh, needs more."

submission: golden sun

date: June 4, 2004

Its a pretty nice song, a nice beginning, but it needs more. You should add some accompniament to the piano. I'm impressed you did it by ear. Keep trying...

Score: 9

"I like it. I just dont know why."

submission: Delayed Opulance

date: April 17, 2004

This is a good song. You can play it over and over again and not get bored of it. You did a good job.

On a sidenote i find it humorus that the song you said you didnt expect to win any awards got second place in the weekly contest...