00:00
00:00
View Profile johnfn

866 Audio Reviews

563 w/ Responses

Congrats on winning! I'm glad your music is getting some recognition :-)

This is a really cool piece. I think my favorite idea was the slightly detuned horns in the first half (e.g 1:16!). I am starting to enjoy that sort of atonal/detuned stuff. Not quite enough to use it in my own music I don't think hehe but you never know...

Phonometrologist responds:

Thanks, mate! I'm sure that if you were to find a way to use atonal/detuned elements in your music you would use it tastefully alongside your melodies and superb production that would then give you even more of a unique voice from others in your genre. That would be exciting!

:) :) :)

I really like this, it is totally my style. I think that it needs a little more dynamics - specifically, things need to get quieter (e.g. 1:45, the lead is way too loud during what should be a break). Also, I think that your melodies are a little too quarter and eighth note heavy. A little more rhythmic variation would do a *lot* of good here.

Great job! :D

<3_____<3

Really good! I really like the opening with the epic choir/organ (come on, it's such a great classic combo!) I also like the section leading right after that.

I looove the arpeggiating baseline in the 'main' section of the track. It sounds great! The one thing that stands out to me in the main section (e.g. 2:14) is the snare. I think this piece could be even better with a sharper more driving snare. Also I think that that vocal synth (also at 2:14) just sounds silly. Everything else though sounds great. Solo at 2:50 sounds pretty good, though I don't really like the timbre of the instrument. I *do* like the stop/start at 3:10 though. That's really fun! :D

Really fun track, great work :o You know how much I like the electric/orchestral combination. Or if you didn't, you do now. :D

Mattashi responds:

Thank you Johnfn :)
Aww I like the vocal synth for some reason xD I guess it's a personal thing, some will like it and some wont.
Thanks again for reviewing!

Hhaha awesome!!! The ending made me grin. It is pretty much perfect.

The one thing I wanted to mention compositionally was that the "main melody" (e.g. 3:22), the chord progression should go G -> D -> C -> G -> bm -> C -> G -> One more chord that I can't remember. The chords you were playing seemed a little indistinct to me but imo that bm is really important because it adds that tinge of sadness!! :p

The other thing (I lied when I said one thing) is the instrument choice. Your instrument choice could be better, I think. The instruments could have more expression to them (like vibrato, pitch bend, legato phrases... etc) This is actually the biggest problem I have with the track. I would highly recommend to try to recreate some of your favorite instruments from other tracks. I mean, you know how I love my smooth leads and all, but you don't have to go down that exact same route. For example, the vibrato at :22 just doesn't make any sense to me. The lead instrument at 1:35 is just, I dunno, it just seems the wrong guy to be carrying that melody.

The composition is pretty good (wait, am I just complementing myself? :D) but I think you can do better! I thought you did do a pretty good job of fleshing out like 20 seconds of content into a full song. Very cool to see.

Wait, is that little riff at 1:05 a reference to "you win!"? Ok... it's probably not. Still that would be pretty funny. It definitely fits with the theme of "Good Ending" xD

P.S. Also who is this mysterious "johnfm" fellow that RealFaction keeps talking about?!? I gotta meet him.

LunacyEcho responds:

=> ending =>

;) How ironic.

=> main melody =>

Our main melody went G-D-C-G-D-C-G-D for the first eight bars (we spent a while writing out what we thought you played on a whiteboard). We never even considered B minor, but in hindsight, knowing your penchant for sad sad, we probably should've realized.

I hope replacing bm with D works in this scenario, since they're just mode-shifted scales with the same sharps. Having a bm in the middle of the chorus would add a little bit of sadness to what would be an otherwise uplifting and happy piece. :P

=> instrument choice =>

Agh! I was using a MIDI keyboard, and I even had access to pitchbend and mod wheels, but I thought 'I probably shouldn't use these, it would unnecessarily complicate the song'. I don't have much experience in picking lead instruments for details like what you mentioned, but I'll definitely be on the lookout for those kinds of things from now on.

=> vibrato at 0:22 =>

? I'm not quite sure what you mean... You mean just the main instrument that plays during this part?

=> 1:35 =>

I actually like that lead instrument quite a lot! :( I guess it has more merit on its own, though. It's also the same lead used for another of my songs whose composition I enjoy - Glass Sky! I guess I am a bit partial to it. :P

=> am I just complimenting myself? =>

Yes.

=> 1:05 =>

SO THAT'S WHERE IT CAME FROM! I wrote the riff, and I was like 'no. this can't be right. this sounds too johnfn not to be accidentally stolen from some johnfn song.' But I just couldn't find it as a riff in any of your songs. I didn't look at 'you win!', though! Thanks! I stole more from you than I thought. :D

=> johnfm =>

Your comments have better endings than your songs. :D

Nice job! I like the more toned down mix. I caught a couple of minor differences between the two versions in the different solos. Honestly the only thing that sounded weird to me was the guitar tone around 1:38 (vibrato?). I also think I liked the old outro slightly more over just descending arps. Other than that, I like this one a lot.

Pretty ridiculous song.

Great job, ChronoNomad. Pull that piano out of the mix a little bit - put it right in the center where it belongs (when the strings come in, the piano is hidden behind them a little, see 2:22), and fix the velocities on the notes, it sounds very mechanical right now. And replace those drums with something that sounds better - use some reference tracks if you're not sure exactly what would fit. Free drum packs are EVERYWHERE online, so you have no excuse >:)

This song has everything that I like. It's got acoustic guitar. It's got piano. It's got descending baselines and modulations. It's got great melodies. It's even got different sections and horns. You fix those 2.5 issues I mentioned and this is the BEST TRACK EVER.

ChronoNomad responds:

I hardly enough know what to say. You're a hard fella to impress, so I'm admittedly a bit speechless... Fortunately, I can still type a little. Shifting the piano to the center is easy peasy, and I don't want it to be overshadowed by anything else, so good call. I'll have to think about what to do with the velocities since they're already exceedingly variable. I suppose they could use a bit of tweaking here and there, though I guess it just doesn't jump out at me as much in most places. As for the drums, I suppose the hats could be improved a bit, but I'm quite fond of the kick. The sidestick is absolutely vital; nothing else sounds as good in its place. My only complaint with the drum kit itself (DSK DrumZ - MachineZ) is that the note strength doesn't change with velocity adjustments for some reason. Rather odd, that.

Everything that you like, eh? That's it! Now I know the secret formula! Acoustic guitar, piano, descending bass lines and modulations...CHECK! I feel quite honored to receive almost full marks from you, and I'll see what can be done with those 2.5 issues you've mentioned. Thanks a ton for the in-depth review, my friend! Much appreciated. ^___^

Melodies: The main riff is pretty nice! It definitely merits being repeated throughout the song. Good job! My main criticism is that when you try to do variations or solos on it, you're using too many quarter notes and you need to mix up your rhythms a little bit. 1:54 is a good example. Or 2:19. More complex rhythms can spice up a melody nicely. (I've actually been thinking about this in context with my own music too.)

I like the break at 1:43. I thought the song was over for a second! haha. I think it might be more effective if you didn't bring in the bass immediately. I do enjoy how the song is empty for a second though.

The mixing sounds pretty good to me! The bass stands out and the other voices are not fighting to be heard. The only thing that I thought could be fixed was the drums. They're too quiet! EVERYONE gets drum loudness wrong, all the time, always, including me, even though I already know this - so don't feel bad. Slap a compressor on those bad boys. It doesn't have to be aggressive, but I do think they should be louder.

Synths: I think they sound cool, but I don't really think that they belong in a song like this. Like the first synth that you introduce (:18) has got this really eerie feel to it that clashes with the otherwise chill and happy vibe the song has going. I honestly think that a piano would be perfect. Though I always think a piano would be perfect. :D Other orchestral instruments to carry the other voices (like strings, woodwinds especially) would do well, too.

While I'm talking about sound choice, the drums are kinda electro and a clap is pretty weird in a song that's emotional like this one. I would personally use someone like Skullbeatz on newgrounds as a reference. He has beats with emotive tracks all the time, and he does pretty good at it. (I mean, come on, he has the word "beatz" in his USERNAME).

I'm all for using reference tracks. Good artists copy, great artists steal, blah blah.

I was also thinking that you could switch up the progression somewhere in there and get more feels out of the piece. The main progression is great and carries the feel of the song nicely but if you switch up then you can get even more mileage out of it when you switch back to the main progression. One that I think might compliment your main one pretty well is d minor -> g major -> c major -> a minor. Bonus points if you do the descending baseline C -> B- > A for the chord change from C major to a minor. It gives it that extra emotive feel. :D

Also last thing, don't be scared to loop your main melody a little more, you don't have to always make variations on it. Good melodies deserve to be repeated!

Overall, I like this song a lot. Good job! I think the biggest thing to focus on would be synth design. With more organic sounding instruments that match the feel of the piece, the song could go far! :D

LunacyEcho responds:

=> Melodies =>

Whoo! Got one right!

=> mix up your rhythms =>

Wow, that's really insightful. It sounds like something really simple, but after looking back and listening to all the rhythms I used again, I realize that I use the same rhythms a lot. I'm definitely going to pay a lot more attention to melodic rhythms from now on (even though that feels like something I should've been prioritizing in the first place)!

=> break =>

That was definitely inspired by 'i believe' - it really got me thinking about how to use silence in music. Thanks! The reason I didn't keep the bass out was because I don't generally like only having one instrument play at a time (unless it's a solo composition). I try and put a lot of replay value in my music, and when I listen to stuff, one thing I find that really detracts from replay value is having really simple instrumentation, since replay value comes from finding stuff in a song you never found before. It's hard to find the unexpected when you've only got one instrument to listen to.

=> mixing =>

Really? Drums? I've always felt like my earphones made me hear music differently from others, but now I know that's the case. Gotta work harder on mixing!

=> synths =>

Aw... I thought they sounded quite nice! I do agree: this song would be vastly improved with a piano. I kinda liked the sound design on these, but after listening to some of Skullbeatz's stuff, I can see what you mean by instrument choice and the mood of the song.

=> progression =>

You know, I wanted to change up the progression during the break. One of my more progression-based songs was my NGASS one, but this one's pretty boring in terms of chords. I think I'll try using that chord progression in another song!

=> main melody =>

But... repetition! I think in my reviews, the one thing I call out people the most on is their amount of repetition, so I try to keep that to a minimum in my tracks. I guess I could afford to have some more - perhaps changing up the background instruments instead of the main melody to preserve interest?

Thanks a lot for the humongous review! It was so helpful, and it gave me lots of ideas to create new songs with. Good to see you're making your way back to Newgrounds! :)

Screw you Step. Stop hogging all the good mixing. Some of the rest of us need it sometimes :P

Seriously though, what are you doing with your drums around :13 (and elsewhere) to get them to sound so nice and meaty! It must be some special stardust or something.

My only complaint about this song is that the chorus is Hit the Road Jack. I mean I can hardly complain since it's just a baseline but, eh, you know.

It's so fun though! I think my favorite part is at :54 when I thought that you were done with the chorus and transitioning out (in typical Step style of erring so far to the side of not repeating your best parts that you don't even do them at all, hahaha) but then it goes into this alternate take with more orchestral stabs! You totally fooled me for like 2 seconds there. :D

One suggestion is that at 1:01 instead of holding on the final chord you could actually keep ascending the scale. I see the cool kids doing it and it can have an equally interesting effect.

My only thought is that the piece is SO dynamic I find myself wondering how it could work in a game if it's looped? I would expect something that stayed a little more in the background...

But whatever, as a standalone piece this rocks!

Step responds:

JOHNFN. Yay. Thanks for dropping by!

"Screw you Step. Stop hogging all the good mixing. Some of the rest of us need it sometimes :P"

Man, I'm actually really happy with the mixing in this track. I think the sax could've been louder and the bass is a bit too full-bodied, but otherwise I actually think I nailed it for once.

"Seriously though, what are you doing with your drums around :13 (and elsewhere) to get them to sound so nice and meaty! It must be some special stardust or something."

I have no idea, man. Sometimes I just finish composing a section of music and think to myself "how the hell did I do that". I must enter some sort of trance while composing because I can almost never explain how I did anything :(.

"My only complaint about this song is that the chorus is Hit the Road Jack. I mean I can hardly complain since it's just a baseline but, eh, you know."

Yeah, funny story about that actually. I didn't even think of that song when composing this. I finished the first half of the track, went to camoshark and was like "hey look at this sweet descending bassline I invented!", to which he responded by sending me like three different tracks that use this exact same bassline, including Hit The Road Jack. Didn't feel so original after that!

"It's so fun though! I think my favorite part is at :54 when I thought that you were done with the chorus and transitioning out (in typical Step style of erring so far to the side of not repeating your best parts that you don't even do them at all, hahaha) but then it goes into this alternate take with more orchestral stabs! You totally fooled me for like 2 seconds there. :D"

Awesome, so glad you pointed that out. I feel like the nature of the game I made this for is kinda jumpy and hyper, so I wanted to reflect that by doing things like over-the-top shifts in dynamic, plenty of jazz stabs/hits or, as is the case with 0:54, haphazard rhythm changes.

"One suggestion is that at 1:01 instead of holding on the final chord you could actually keep ascending the scale. I see the cool kids doing it and it can have an equally interesting effect."

That's a cool idea. Or maybe I could keep the chord going with the strings/brass and ascend upwards with the mallets.

"My only thought is that the piece is SO dynamic I find myself wondering how it could work in a game if it's looped? I would expect something that stayed a little more in the background...
But whatever, as a standalone piece this rocks!"

Yeah, this is something that gives me a lot of trouble when composing BGM to video games. I can't bring myself to keep the dynamics limited since then I have trouble introducing variety. It's something I need to work on.

Super glad you enjoyed this. Thanks again!

Whoa crazy chord change at :41.

Also that transition at 1:40... I know you can do a better transition than that given how much you complain to me about my transitions hehe ;-)

To me the first half of this track is definitely ambient, but as soon as other instruments other than that watery synth come in, then it loses it's ambientness. (that's a word) It almost like it's two separate songs!

The melodies could use a little bit of help. Try singing/humming to your song (I do this where no one can hear me :P) and then transcribing what you just sung. Sometimes that can help.

I really liked the ambient first half! The watery synth is just awesome. Makes me feel like I'm floating in water, illuminated by sun... drifting around. It feels really nice, and I almost wish you spent a little time just on the chords rather than bringing in the other instruments as early as :20.

Nice job!

TaintedLogic responds:

So nice to see you've been more active these past few weeks, Johnfn! :D Yeah, I love doing crazy chord changes. :3 I agree about the transition at 1:40. There's actually this massive crescendo in the bass at 1:36, but it's really hard to hear because I suck at mixing in Garageband. I'll do better next time! I totally recognize the "it's two separate songs" complaint too. I tried to tie it together with that melody at 2:16 and the chords in the background, but I understand that it still may have not sounded that coherent. That's a helpful tip with the melodies! I might just use that... Glad you liked the ambient part. I try to keep my intros under 30 seconds, but maybe that's a bad thing in this instance, haha. Thanks so much for the review, Johnfn! I'll review your latest track as soon as I get the chance. ;D

i always forget to respond to PMs. its not because i hate you, just because i forgot!!!

Male

MD

Joined on 8/16/03

Level:
20
Exp Points:
4,122 / 4,440
Exp Rank:
12,302
Vote Power:
6.16 votes
Audio Scouts
5
Rank:
Police Sergeant
Global Rank:
8,213
Blams:
474
Saves:
653
B/P Bonus:
12%
Whistle:
Normal
Trophies:
5
Medals:
49
Supporter:
11m 29d
Gear:
8